2012: What's the 'real' truth?

By Alex Thomas
theintelhub.com
April 20, 2012

Al DiCicco, an independent journalist and activist in Mohave County Arizona, has spoken out and rallied against the ongoing geoengineering of our skies at various local city council meetings and other public hearings.

Now, after being involved in a series of tests that proved that he had high levels of barium and aluminum in his blood, Al and a group of concerned citizens are moving forward with a lawsuit to attempt to stop these dangerous chemical trails.

The groups Facebook page, Chemtrail Geoengineering Lawsuit, has become a sort of meeting ground for activists to provide direct evidence.

This group is for those interested in filing a lawsuit for Geoengineering and Chemtrails that have evidence of Chemtrail toxins such as Barium, Aluminum, Strontium and other toxins in their blood or hair, urine, soil, rain water, we plan file a complaint in all 11…

View original post 236 more words

Is The USA Bullying Other Nations Into Geoengineering/Chemtrail

According to a cable released by Wikileaks, the former United States ambassador to France recommended “moving to retaliation” against France in late 2007 to fight a French ban on Monsanto’s genetically modified (GM) corn. Former Ambassador Craig Stapleton (now co-owner of the St. Louis Cardinals baseball team), who was concerned about France’s decision to suspend cultivation of Monsanto’s MON-810 corn, wrote the following to diplomatic colleagues:  “Country team Paris recommends that we calibrate a target retaliation list that causes some pain across the EU since this is a collective responsibility, but that also focuses in part on the worst culprits.”

In late October, 2010, many chemtrail/geoenginnering activists applauded the announcement of a UN ban on Geoengineering.  More than 190 nations agreed to ban geoengineering under a United Nations treaty to protect the diversity of life on Earth. The ban stipulated that “no climate-related geoengineering activities that may affect biodiversity take place, until there is an adequate scientific basis on which to justify such activities and appropriate consideration of the associated risks for the environment and biodiversity and associated social, economic and cultural impacts.”

Read Full Story Here

The Spraying of Norwich

A BBC Inside Out special, documenting the spraying of zinc cadmium sulphide on Norwich during the 60s.

By  on Jan 9, 2011

It’s interesting to note the following:

1) Although it was not tested for toxicity by the British Ministry of Defence, zinc cadmium sulphide was already known to be poisonous and carcinogenic at the time, as is admitted in the documentary. There’s no way how Porton Down bioweapons experts would not have known that;

2) So, why was cadmium chosen for the tests? Wasn’t there any harmless substance these boys could use for their so called bioweapons simulation trials?

3) And, more relevantly, why was cadmium also being used by other governments, in their own tests? After all, that is the excuse given by the British government, to justify their own usage of cadmium;

4) These questions are made even more relevant when taking the more recent chemtrailing into account. The fact is, if you were actually planning to poison a public en masse, for accelerated population reduction in the post-industrial, mass deficit/unemployment age, you would need to take longitudinal testing on the health impacts of your bioweapons. So, you’d conduct hundreds of tests, decades prior to the real operation (and, during those decades, you’d collect data on the health effects of the spraying). Using cadmium, and probably all of the other chemicals that are being used today, such as aluminum or barium..

For news articles on the Norwich tests, go to:
http://www.familiesagainstcancer.org/?id=297